On 2023-10-28 10:35 Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >On 10/27/23 14:31, Patrick O'Neill wrote: >> Hi Fei, >> >> A recent change to GCC [1] updated the the registers in the cm.push and >> cm.pop insns for these testcases: >> >> |FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os check-function-bodies test1 >> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os check-function-bodies >> test2_step1_0_size FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os >> check-function-bodies test3| >[ ... ] >Actually [1-9] looks better upon further review.
hi Patrick Thanks for adapting the TCs. I follow Jeff's advice {ra, s0-s[1-9]} for case {ra, s0-sx}. BR Fei > >jeff