On 2023-10-28 10:35  Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>On 10/27/23 14:31, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
>> Hi Fei,
>>
>> A recent change to GCC [1] updated the  the registers in the cm.push and
>> cm.pop insns for these testcases:
>>
>> |FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os check-function-bodies test1
>> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os check-function-bodies
>> test2_step1_0_size FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rv32i_zcmp.c -Os
>> check-function-bodies test3|
>[ ... ]
>Actually [1-9] looks better upon further review. 

hi Patrick

Thanks for adapting the TCs.
I follow Jeff's advice {ra, s0-s[1-9]} for case {ra, s0-sx}.

BR
Fei
>
>jeff

Reply via email to