Use `mode0' and `mode1' shorthands respectively for `GET_MODE (op0)' and 
`GET_MODE (op1)' to improve code readability.

        gcc/
        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Use 
        `mode0' and `mode1' for `GET_MODE (op0)' and `GET_MODE (op1)'.
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

gcc-riscv-expand-conditional-move-mode-cmp.diff
Index: gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
===================================================================
--- gcc.orig/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ gcc/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -4007,12 +4007,15 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest,
   else if (TARGET_ZICOND_LIKE
           && GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_INT)
     {
+      machine_mode mode0 = GET_MODE (op0);
+      machine_mode mode1 = GET_MODE (op1);
+
       /* The comparison must be comparing WORD_MODE objects.   We must
         enforce that so that we don't strip away a sign_extension
         thinking it is unnecessary.  We might consider using
         riscv_extend_operands if they are not already properly extended.  */
-      if ((GET_MODE (op0) != word_mode && GET_MODE (op0) != VOIDmode)
-         || (GET_MODE (op1) != word_mode && GET_MODE (op1) != VOIDmode))
+      if ((mode0 != word_mode && mode0 != VOIDmode)
+         || (mode1 != word_mode && mode1 != VOIDmode))
        return false;
 
       /* Canonicalize the comparison.  It must be an equality comparison
@@ -4032,9 +4035,9 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest,
          rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (word_mode);
 
          /* We can support both FP and integer conditional moves.  */
-         if (INTEGRAL_MODE_P (GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 0))))
+         if (INTEGRAL_MODE_P (mode0))
            riscv_expand_int_scc (tmp, code, op0, op1, invert_ptr);
-         else if (FLOAT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 0)))
+         else if (FLOAT_MODE_P (mode0)
                   && fp_scc_comparison (op, GET_MODE (op)))
            riscv_expand_float_scc (tmp, code, op0, op1);
          else

Reply via email to