On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 16:18, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com> wrote: > > > From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:55:22 +0000 > > > The changelog entry does say "Change compile test to run." > > Wow, it's right there. The doh:est of doh:s on me. Sorry > for wasting your time on that.
Heh, no real time wasted, it was useful to mark PR 112541 as affecting more than just armv8. > > > > PS. Sorry, I have no idea why regarding the underlying multi-target > > > problem > > > > I have some vague speculation in PR 112541. > > From comment #1: > "It appears that __stacktrace_impl::_S_current returns an > empty sequence of frames. > > It's possible that all the lambda frames are inlined, or > skip+2 in stacktrace.cc causes us to skip real frames that > we should keep, or maybe libbacktrace just doesn't work on > this target." > > All more or less likely, with libbacktrace not working for > three targets maybe less likely. Or more. > > Anyway, if I haven't found time to look at this myself > within...say two months, I think I'll xfail it for cris-elf. I hope to have some time to look into the libbacktrace behaviour myself. I wasn't seeing it on any of the targets I can test myself, but I recently did a bootstrap+regtest on sparc-sub-solaris-2.11 and it fails there too. So maybe I'll be able to debug it soon.
