On 21/11/23 3:15 pm, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/11/23 3:02 pm, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:30 AM Ajit Agarwal <aagar...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello All:
>>>
>>> This patch marked LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic
>>> block. This is because Livein at each basic block is live in at the loop 
>>> header.
>>
>> The current code does the same, you now have fewer regs live.  In fact
>> your patch removes all of the settings since when
>> loop->aux == NULL there's no LOOP_DATA (loop), so you never do anything.
>>
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I forgot to remove the check loop-aux == 
> NULL
> in the patch that I sent.
> 
> My mistake. Sorry for that.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit

I did copy from one directory to another and forgot to remove loop->aux == NULL 
check
in the patch that I sent.

My mistake. But anyhow I have tested without that check.

Sorry for inconvenience caused. I will make sure this wont happen again in the 
future
patches.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit
>> It appears that you do not fully grasp the changes done by your
>> patches - you need to improve
>> in this regard and either provide better explanations or stop sending these 
>> kind
>> of patches.
>>
>> I will stop looking at your patches now, it appears to be a waste of
>> my precious time.
>>
>> Peter - please work with Ajit here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu.
>>>
>>> SPEC CPU 2017 benchmarks score is better than trunk wit this
>>> change for INT and FP benchmarks.
>>>
>>> THanks & Regards
>>> Ajit
>>>
>>>
>>> rtl-optimization: Modify loop live data with livein of loop header
>>>
>>> Livein at each basic block is live in at the loop header.
>>> Marked LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic
>>> block.
>>>
>>> 2023-11-21  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagar...@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>         * loop-invariant.cc (calculate_loop_reg_pressure): Mark
>>>         LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic block.
>>> ---
>>>  gcc/loop-invariant.cc | 11 ++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/loop-invariant.cc b/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>>> index a9b156682bc..c15e6168d5d 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>>> @@ -2169,17 +2169,18 @@ calculate_loop_reg_pressure (void)
>>>        }
>>>    ira_setup_eliminable_regset ();
>>>    bitmap_initialize (&curr_regs_live, &reg_obstack);
>>> +
>>> +  /* Livein (loop_hdr) is live at each of the loop basic blocks.  */
>>> +  for (auto loop : loops_list (cfun, 0))
>>> +    if (loop->aux == NULL)
>>> +      bitmap_ior_into (&LOOP_DATA (loop)->regs_live, DF_LR_IN 
>>> (loop->header));
>>> +
>>>    FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
>>>      {
>>>        curr_loop = bb->loop_father;
>>>        if (curr_loop == current_loops->tree_root)
>>>         continue;
>>>
>>> -      for (class loop *loop = curr_loop;
>>> -          loop != current_loops->tree_root;
>>> -          loop = loop_outer (loop))
>>> -       bitmap_ior_into (&LOOP_DATA (loop)->regs_live, DF_LR_IN (bb));
>>> -
>>>        bitmap_copy (&curr_regs_live, DF_LR_IN (bb));
>>>        for (i = 0; i < ira_pressure_classes_num; i++)
>>>         curr_reg_pressure[ira_pressure_classes[i]] = 0;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.3
>>>

Reply via email to