Could you rebase to the trunk ? I don't think segment load store cost depends 
on previous patch you sent.



juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
 
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2024-03-01 23:07
To: 钟居哲; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng
CC: rdapp.gcc; Jeff Law
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add initial cost handling for segment loads/stores.
> +  /* Segment load/store permute cost.  */
> +  const int segment_permute_2;
> +  const int segment_permute_4;
> +  const int segment_permute_8;
> 
> Why do we only have 2/4/8, I think we should have 2/3/4/5/6/7/8
 
No idea why I posted that (wrong) version, I used it for
some testing locally.  Attached is the proper version, still
called it v3...
 
Regards
Robin
 
Subject: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Add initial cost handling for segment
loads/stores.
 
This patch makes segment loads and stores more expensive.  It adds
segment_permute_2 as well as 3 to 8 cost fields to the common vector
costs and adds handling to adjust_stmt_cost.
 
gcc/ChangeLog:
 
* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (struct common_vector_cost): Add
segment_permute cost.
* config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc (costs::adjust_stmt_cost):
Handle segment loads/stores.
* config/riscv/riscv.cc: Initialize segment_permute_[2-8] to 1.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h        |   9 ++
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-------
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc              |  14 +++
3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
index 80efdf2b7e5..90d1fcbb3b1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
@@ -218,6 +218,15 @@ struct common_vector_cost
   const int gather_load_cost;
   const int scatter_store_cost;
+  /* Segment load/store permute cost.  */
+  const int segment_permute_2;
+  const int segment_permute_3;
+  const int segment_permute_4;
+  const int segment_permute_5;
+  const int segment_permute_6;
+  const int segment_permute_7;
+  const int segment_permute_8;
+
   /* Cost of a vector-to-scalar operation.  */
   const int vec_to_scalar_cost;
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc 
b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
index adf9c197df5..f4da213fe14 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
@@ -1043,6 +1043,25 @@ costs::better_main_loop_than_p (const vector_costs 
*uncast_other) const
   return vector_costs::better_main_loop_than_p (other);
}
+/* Returns the group size i.e. the number of vectors to be loaded by a
+   segmented load/store instruction.  Return 0 if it is no segmented
+   load/store.  */
+static int
+segment_loadstore_group_size (enum vect_cost_for_stmt kind,
+       stmt_vec_info stmt_info)
+{
+  if (stmt_info
+      && (kind == vector_load || kind == vector_store)
+      && STMT_VINFO_DATA_REF (stmt_info))
+    {
+      stmt_info = DR_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (stmt_info);
+      if (stmt_info
+   && STMT_VINFO_MEMORY_ACCESS_TYPE (stmt_info) == VMAT_LOAD_STORE_LANES)
+ return DR_GROUP_SIZE (stmt_info);
+    }
+  return 0;
+}
+
/* Adjust vectorization cost after calling riscv_builtin_vectorization_cost.
    For some statement, we would like to further fine-grain tweak the cost on
    top of riscv_builtin_vectorization_cost handling which doesn't have any
@@ -1067,55 +1086,115 @@ costs::adjust_stmt_cost (enum vect_cost_for_stmt kind, 
loop_vec_info loop,
     case vector_load:
     case vector_store:
{
-   /* Unit-stride vector loads and stores do not have offset addressing
-      as opposed to scalar loads and stores.
-      If the address depends on a variable we need an additional
-      add/sub for each load/store in the worst case.  */
-   if (stmt_info && stmt_info->stmt)
+   if (stmt_info && stmt_info->stmt && STMT_VINFO_DATA_REF (stmt_info))
    {
-       data_reference *dr = STMT_VINFO_DATA_REF (stmt_info);
-       class loop *father = stmt_info->stmt->bb->loop_father;
-       if (!loop && father && !father->inner && father->superloops)
+       /* Segment loads and stores.  When the group size is > 1
+ the vectorizer will add a vector load/store statement for
+ each vector in the group.  Here we additionally add permute
+ costs for each.  */
+       /* TODO: Indexed and ordered/unordered cost.  */
+       int group_size = segment_loadstore_group_size (kind, stmt_info);
+       if (group_size > 1)
+ {
+   switch (group_size)
+     {
+     case 2:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_2;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_2;
+       break;
+     case 3:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_3;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_3;
+       break;
+     case 4:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_4;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_4;
+       break;
+     case 5:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_5;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_5;
+       break;
+     case 6:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_6;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_6;
+       break;
+     case 7:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_7;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_7;
+       break;
+     case 8:
+       if (riscv_v_ext_vector_mode_p (loop->vector_mode))
+ stmt_cost += costs->vla->segment_permute_8;
+       else
+ stmt_cost += costs->vls->segment_permute_8;
+       break;
+     default:
+       break;
+     }
+ }
+       else
{
-   tree ref;
-   if (TREE_CODE (dr->ref) != MEM_REF
-       || !(ref = TREE_OPERAND (dr->ref, 0))
-       || TREE_CODE (ref) != SSA_NAME)
-     break;
+   /* Unit-stride vector loads and stores do not have offset
+      addressing as opposed to scalar loads and stores.
+      If the address depends on a variable we need an additional
+      add/sub for each load/store in the worst case.  */
+   data_reference *dr = STMT_VINFO_DATA_REF (stmt_info);
+   class loop *father = stmt_info->stmt->bb->loop_father;
+   if (!loop && father && !father->inner && father->superloops)
+     {
+       tree ref;
+       if (TREE_CODE (dr->ref) != MEM_REF
+   || !(ref = TREE_OPERAND (dr->ref, 0))
+   || TREE_CODE (ref) != SSA_NAME)
+ break;
-   if (SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (ref))
-     break;
+       if (SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (ref))
+ break;
-   if (memrefs.contains ({ref, cst0}))
-     break;
+       if (memrefs.contains ({ref, cst0}))
+ break;
-   memrefs.add ({ref, cst0});
+       memrefs.add ({ref, cst0});
-   /* In case we have not seen REF before and the base address
-      is a pointer operation try a bit harder.  */
-   tree base = DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr);
-   if (TREE_CODE (base) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
-       || TREE_CODE (base) == POINTER_DIFF_EXPR)
-     {
-       /* Deconstruct BASE's first operand.  If it is a binary
- operation, i.e. a base and an "offset" store this
- pair.  Only increase the stmt_cost if we haven't seen
- it before.  */
-       tree argp = TREE_OPERAND (base, 1);
-       typedef std::pair<tree, tree> addr_pair;
-       addr_pair pair;
-       if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (argp)) == tcc_binary)
+       /* In case we have not seen REF before and the base
+ address is a pointer operation try a bit harder.  */
+       tree base = DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr);
+       if (TREE_CODE (base) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
+   || TREE_CODE (base) == POINTER_DIFF_EXPR)
{
-   tree argp0 = tree_strip_nop_conversions
-     (TREE_OPERAND (argp, 0));
-   tree argp1 = TREE_OPERAND (argp, 1);
-   pair = addr_pair (argp0, argp1);
-   if (memrefs.contains (pair))
-     break;
-
-   memrefs.add (pair);
-   stmt_cost += builtin_vectorization_cost (scalar_stmt,
-    NULL_TREE, 0);
+   /* Deconstruct BASE's first operand.  If it is a
+      binary operation, i.e. a base and an "offset"
+      store this pair.  Only increase the stmt_cost if
+      we haven't seen it before.  */
+   tree argp = TREE_OPERAND (base, 1);
+   typedef std::pair<tree, tree> addr_pair;
+   addr_pair pair;
+   if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (argp)) == tcc_binary)
+     {
+       tree argp0 = tree_strip_nop_conversions
+ (TREE_OPERAND (argp, 0));
+       tree argp1 = TREE_OPERAND (argp, 1);
+       pair = addr_pair (argp0, argp1);
+       if (memrefs.contains (pair))
+ break;
+
+       memrefs.add (pair);
+       stmt_cost
+ += builtin_vectorization_cost (scalar_stmt,
+        NULL_TREE, 0);
+     }
}
    }
}
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 5e984ee2a55..874a42873d7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -365,6 +365,13 @@ static const common_vector_cost rvv_vls_vector_cost = {
   1, /* fp_stmt_cost  */
   1, /* gather_load_cost  */
   1, /* scatter_store_cost  */
+  1, /* segment_permute (2) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (3) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (4) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (5) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (6) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (7) */
+  1, /* segment_permute (8) */
   1, /* vec_to_scalar_cost  */
   1, /* scalar_to_vec_cost  */
   1, /* permute_cost  */
@@ -381,6 +388,13 @@ static const scalable_vector_cost rvv_vla_vector_cost = {
     1, /* fp_stmt_cost  */
     1, /* gather_load_cost  */
     1, /* scatter_store_cost  */
+    1, /* segment_permute (2) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (3) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (4) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (5) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (6) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (7) */
+    1, /* segment_permute (8) */
     1, /* vec_to_scalar_cost  */
     1, /* scalar_to_vec_cost  */
     1, /* permute_cost  */
-- 
2.43.2
 
 

Reply via email to