On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:21:31AM -0500, Robert Dubner wrote:
> > Here is a fixed patch, passes make check-cobol, but that is unfortunately
> > still not enough.
>
> With this second fixed patch, all of our tests pass.
Great.
Is the patch ok for trunk then, or do you plan to review it or will
James do that?
> Implicit criticism about tests accepted. I have 679 UAT tests, and now
> I've got the bit in my teeth, and I am creating a process that will
> convert as many as I can to DejaGnu. However: the autom4te and DejaGnu
> principles, practices, and philosophies are almost, but not quite,
> completely unlike each other.
Didn't mean to criticize in any way, just mention that because we have
just 23 tests so far, the UAT/NIST testing you are doing is a precondition
for any non-trivial FE changes and that testing wasn't done on my side.
Jakub
