On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:39:59PM +0000, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: > > The third case looks undesirable, -fno-ipa-reorder-for-locality is the > > default and shouldn't affect anything, whether explicit or implicit. > > I see. With this patch I don’t get a complaint on > -flto-partition=balanced -fno-ipa-reorder-for-locality while still getting > the error for -fipa-reorder-for-locality with any -flto-partition= > value. Thanks, Kyrill
Ok for both trunk and 15 if it passes testing. Jakub