> On 24 Apr 2025, at 14:44, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:39:59PM +0000, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: >>> The third case looks undesirable, -fno-ipa-reorder-for-locality is the >>> default and shouldn't affect anything, whether explicit or implicit. >> >> I see. With this patch I don’t get a complaint on >> -flto-partition=balanced -fno-ipa-reorder-for-locality while still getting >> the error for -fipa-reorder-for-locality with any -flto-partition= >> value. Thanks, Kyrill > > Ok for both trunk and 15 if it passes testing. >
Thanks again for your help. Pushed to trunk and 15 after a normal and lto-locality bootstrap on aarch64-linux. Kyrill > Jakub >
