Hi! The approved P3778R0 wording doesn't have type_order<_Tp, _Up>::type, so this patch removes it.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2025-11-10 Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> * libsupc++/compare: Implement final wording of C++26 P3778R0 - Fix for type_order template definition. (std::type_order): Remove type member. --- libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/compare.jj 2025-09-02 16:52:09.435337136 +0200 +++ libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/compare 2025-11-08 08:31:23.827194690 +0100 @@ -1272,7 +1272,6 @@ namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(defaul { static constexpr strong_ordering value = __builtin_type_order(_Tp, _Up); using value_type = strong_ordering; - using type = type_order<_Tp, _Up>; constexpr operator value_type() const noexcept { return value; } constexpr value_type operator()() const noexcept { return value; } }; Jakub
