On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 06:56:52PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote: > Hi Mike, > The second patch in this series should be a separate patch by itself as it > is not related to adding -mcpu=future option.
I re-issued the patch as V9. See: * https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-November/701859.html * https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-November/701861.html * https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-November/701862.html Thanks for your comments. -- Michael Meissner, IBM PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432 email: [email protected]
