> From: Jiang, Haochen > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2025 10:05 AM > > > From: Gerald Pfeifer <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2025 8:14 AM > > > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2025, Haochen Jiang wrote: > > > > Maybe add "any longer" at the end? > > > > > + Based on ISA extensions enabled on Alder Lake, the switch intially > further > > > + enables the AVX-IFMA, AVX-NE-CONVERT, AVX-VNNI-INT8 and > CMPccXADD ISA > > > + extensions. Since GCC 13.2, ENQCMD and UINTR are further enabled. > > > > Typo, "initially". > > > > Though how about saying "this switch in addition enables ... Since GCC > > 13.2, ENQCMD and UINTR are enabled as well"? > > Should I also unify the wording to "in addition" from "further" in other > scenario, i.e., other march options?
I have changed all of them to "in addition" and applied the patch Thx, Haochen > > > > > > + <li><code>-mavx10.1-256</code>, <code>-mavx10.1-512</code>, and > > > + <code>-mevex512</code> were removed together with the warning for > the > > > + behavior change on <code>-mavx10.1</code>. <code>- > mavx10.1</code> has > > > + enabled AVX10.1 intrinsics with 512-bit vector support since GCC 15. > > > > Just to make sure: the warning was removed? If so, all good. > > Yes they were removed. > > > > > Wow, that's quite a bit. Thanks for your careful work tracking all these! > > > > (Patch is okay.) > > I will apply all the suggestions in the thread. > > Thx, > Haochen
