Hi Alice,

> On 5 Jan 2026, at 15:39, Alice Carlotti <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This series has three parts.  The first three patches fix issues arising from
> the original assumption that SME implied SVE2.  Patch 4 can then remove the
> "sorry" we put in place last year for "+sme+nosve" configurations.  The
> remaining patches adapt existing tests (either in place or by creating
> duplicate copies) to provide good test coverage for +sme+nosve configurations.
> 
> Apart from the addition of __arm_get_current_vg to libgcc, this series should
> have no functional change for any feature combinations that are currently
> supported on trunk.

thanks for adding me to the cc.

I merged this with my current Darwin branch and built / tested it - the tests 
are
somewhat inconclusive at the moment, since there are hundreds of function
body check fails - which (probably) just mean I need to tweak the tests to cater
for the code-gen differences (but of course could be more sinister).  Tweaking
is very time-consuming so I don’t think it will get done any time soon.

Is there some generic execution smoke test for SME (without SVE)?

thanks
Iain

> 
> Is this ok for master?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alice

Reply via email to