On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 6:20 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2026-01-28 20:37, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > >> I think overall the idea here is solid, just the walk back I am > >> questioning if needed. > > > > Thanks, I was looking for assurance that I'm heading in the right > > direction. Thanks to your questions, I realized I should maybe try > > experimenting with strncpy as well; I have a feeling this will trip > > builtins too, not just general functions with the access attribute. I'll > > incorporate that into v2. > > This tunnel does indeed go deep; it's going to be a bit more involved, I > just need to figure out the cleanest way to do this.
And unions are not the one case where the problem shows up. I added another simple testcase to PR 123801 which shows unions are not only the issue in the end :(. And that has been an issue since GCC 11 even. So maybe we should rethink waccess3 . Thanks, Andrew > > Sid
