On 2026-01-28 22:00, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 6:20 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-01-28 20:37, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I think overall the idea here is solid, just the walk back I am
questioning if needed.
Thanks, I was looking for assurance that I'm heading in the right
direction. Thanks to your questions, I realized I should maybe try
experimenting with strncpy as well; I have a feeling this will trip
builtins too, not just general functions with the access attribute. I'll
incorporate that into v2.
This tunnel does indeed go deep; it's going to be a bit more involved, I
just need to figure out the cleanest way to do this.
And unions are not the one case where the problem shows up.
I added another simple testcase to PR 123801 which shows unions are
not only the issue in the end :(.
And that has been an issue since GCC 11 even. So maybe we should
rethink waccess3 .
Ugh, I just saw that. Let me think about this a bit more.
Thanks,
Sid
