Thanks Jeff. The vfmax.vf/vfmin.vf failure are still here, I will continue to take care of it. And all vx_vf/vx* related test cases should be Ok now.
Pan -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Law <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2026 12:16 AM To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Chen, Ken <[email protected]>; Liu, Hongtao <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add vr2gpr and vr2fpr cost value param On 2/4/2026 4:47 AM, [email protected] wrote: > From: Pan Li <[email protected]> > > The enhanced middle-end record_stmt_cost introduce slp_node and its' > vectype for cost model, that make the vr to scalar cost is counted > during backend adjust cost. Thus, to make test happy, add param > include both the vr2gpr and vr2fpr cost. > > Pan Li (6): > RISC-V: Introduce vr2gpr-cost= for customizing the cost when vr2gpr > [PR123916] > RISC-V: Adjust the vx-[456]* testcase by param=vr2gpr-cost [PR123916] > RISC-V: Introduce vr2fpr-cost= for customizing the cost when vr2fpr > [PR123916] > RISC-V: Adjust the vf-[378]* testcase by param=vr2fpr-cost [PR123916] > RISC-V: Add test case for PR123916 > RISC-V: Adjust testcase asm check for vx-[56]-i[16|8].c [PR123916] This series is fine. Thanks for tacking care of it. jeff
