!a-b-c is not the same as ! a-b-c.  In !a-b-c, the '!' is part of the
triplet that istarget attempts to match.  Fix all occurrences, except
for gcc.dg/vect/vect-93.c, that is taken care of separately.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.  Also tested with ppc-vx7r2,
ppc64-vx7r2, arm-vx7r2, and aarch64-vx7r2.  Ok to install?


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        * gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c: Separate ! from triplet.
        * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c: Likewise.
        * gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90: Likewise.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c   |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c   |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c   |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c   |    2 +-
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c      |    4 ++--
 .../gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90        |    2 +-
 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c
index a08130cfc0725..1d8d7778d273d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-variables-5.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 /* Expect 2 array types, one of which is unsized.  For BPF target, -gprune-btf
    is the default and will remove the unsized array type.  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x4\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bta_nelems" 1 
} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bta_nelems" 1 { 
target { !bpf-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bta_nelems" 1 { 
target { ! bpf-*-* } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bta_nelems" 0 { 
target { bpf-*-* } } } } */
 
 extern const char FOO[];
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c
index 6e566da4dba4b..516357d3c9201 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    be assigned without clobbering cc.  For a PLUS rtx on S/390 this
    requires a load address instruction which is fine on 64 bit but
    cannot be used on 31 bit since it does a 31 bit add only.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { { !s390*-*-* || lp64 } && nonpic } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { { { ! s390*-*-* } || lp64 } && nonpic } } } } */
 
 #define BUF 100
 long a[BUF];
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c
index 05ffd8d93f0ab..2e1283233788b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    be assigned without clobbering cc.  For a PLUS rtx on S/390 this
    requires a load address instruction which is fine on 64 bit but
    cannot be used on 31 bit since it does a 31 bit add only.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { !s390*-*-* || lp64 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { { ! s390*-*-* } || lp64 } } } } */
 
 #define BUF 100
 long a[BUF];
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c
index f274fa1334544..0a705edd79cf3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-3.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    be assigned without clobbering cc.  For a PLUS rtx on S/390 this
    requires a load address instruction which is fine on 64 bit but
    cannot be used on 31 bit since it does a 31 bit add only.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { !s390*-*-* || lp64 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "PRE/HOIST: end of bb .* copying expression" 
"hoist" { target { { ! s390*-*-* } || lp64 } } } } */
 
 #define BUF 100
 long a[BUF];
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c
index b9ad8c1dd36a6..adecb3cd67233 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c
@@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ int bar ()
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "beqctrl-" { target { lp64 || { powerpc*-*-aix* 
} } } } } */
 
 /* The other ABIs do allow a sibcall.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "beqctr-" { target { ilp32 && !powerpc*-*-aix* 
} } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {b \$} { target { ilp32 && !powerpc*-*-aix* } } 
} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "beqctr-" { target { ilp32 && { ! 
powerpc*-*-aix* } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {b \$} { target { ilp32 && { ! powerpc*-*-aix* 
} } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90 
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90
index 71b66cb5d0869..0ac172d571c7f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-14.f90
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ contains
     integer :: a, b
 
     ! At gimplification time, we can't decide yet which function to call.
-    ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "f04 \\\(x" 2 "gimple" { target { 
!aarch64*-*-* } } } }
+    ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "f04 \\\(x" 2 "gimple" { target { ! 
aarch64*-*-* } } } }
     ! After simd clones are created, the original non-clone test1 shall
     ! call f03 (score 6), the sse2/avx/avx2 clones too, but avx512f clones
     ! shall call f01 with score 8.


-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/
Free Software Activist     FSFLA co-founder     GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity.
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!

Reply via email to