Hi Jin, > Thanks for the review. Know that I'm not a RISC-V port reviewer. I can't approve your patches. I'm just providing opinions, you're free to disagree with me :p
> Since the core logic remains largely unchanged (aside from these fixes), I > initially believed the existing test suite would be sufficient. If you found bugs, they're clearly insufficient. That's a bit the problem, most of these fusion checks are lacking tests. > That said, if you feel that specific test cases are necessary to validate > these fixes, I am happy to add them. Please let me know if you would like > me to update this patch with new tests. Please do, would be useful. Thanks, Michiel
