On 02/06/26 11:09 am, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 04:49:11PM +0530, jeevitha wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch depends on the "Add PowerPC future hardware compiler support
>> checks" patch. It will be upstreamed after the above patch is
>> upstreamed. These changes have been bootstrapped and regression tested
>> on powerpc64le-linux.
>>
>> Changes from V3:
>> * Moved target-supports.exp changes to separate patch.
>> * Added respective dg flags and checks.
>>
>> Changes from V2:
>> * Corrected wording in amo.h.
>> * Added new dg-do run test.
>> * Added powerpc_future_hw_ok object.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>> * Corrected wording in amo.h and the test file.
>> * Added changes to extend.texi.
>>
>> This patch adds support for compare-and-swap-equal atomic memory
>> operations that may be added to a future PowerPC processor. Note that
>> the names of these functions may change in the future.
>>
>> Add _AMO_LD_CS_EQ to the _AMO_LD enum and define four new
>> compare-and-swap equal helper functions, all guarded by _ARCH_FUTURE.
>> For non-Future targets, provide error-attribute stubs to emit a
>> compile-time diagnostic.
>>
>> 2026-05-27 Jeevitha Palanisamy <[email protected]>
>
> This looks ok once the previous patches are committed.
This patch has been committed to trunk. Can I backport it to
GCC 16 branch as well?
