On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 08:45:05PM +0530, jeevitha wrote: > > > On 02/06/26 11:09 am, Michael Meissner wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 04:49:11PM +0530, jeevitha wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> This patch depends on the "Add PowerPC future hardware compiler support > >> checks" patch. It will be upstreamed after the above patch is > >> upstreamed. These changes have been bootstrapped and regression tested > >> on powerpc64le-linux. > >> > >> Changes from V3: > >> * Moved target-supports.exp changes to separate patch. > >> * Added respective dg flags and checks. > >> > >> Changes from V2: > >> * Corrected wording in amo.h. > >> * Added new dg-do run test. > >> * Added powerpc_future_hw_ok object. > >> > >> Changes from V1: > >> * Corrected wording in amo.h and the test file. > >> * Added changes to extend.texi. > >> > >> This patch adds support for compare-and-swap-equal atomic memory > >> operations that may be added to a future PowerPC processor. Note that > >> the names of these functions may change in the future. > >> > >> Add _AMO_LD_CS_EQ to the _AMO_LD enum and define four new > >> compare-and-swap equal helper functions, all guarded by _ARCH_FUTURE. > >> For non-Future targets, provide error-attribute stubs to emit a > >> compile-time diagnostic. > >> > >> 2026-05-27 Jeevitha Palanisamy <[email protected]> > > > > This looks ok once the previous patches are committed. > > This patch has been committed to trunk. Can I backport it to > GCC 16 branch as well?
Yes. -- Michael Meissner, IBM PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432 email: [email protected]
