On 2026-06-25 14:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 at 13:20, Torbjorn SVENSSON
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-25 13:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 at 10:56, Torbjorn SVENSSON
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Did you find any way to get this to work without atomics?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-June/721613.html should
solve this.
Are you able to check that, or should I push it to the forge and ask
the linaro ci-bot to check it?
I can give it a try. Will let you know about the outcome tomorrow.
Great, thanks. I'll be revising the patch slightly, but it would still
be good to know if the general approach solves the problem.
I can confirm that your patch resolves the failures on arm-none-eabi that I
targeted with my original patch.
I can also confirm that your patch does not cause any regressions for any of
the arm-none-eabi permutations that I test.
Thank you for fixing this a better way than mine!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
