On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 07:16, Torbjorn SVENSSON <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2026-06-25 14:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 at 13:20, Torbjorn SVENSSON > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2026-06-25 13:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 at 10:56, Torbjorn SVENSSON > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Jonathan, > >>>> > >>>> Did you find any way to get this to work without atomics? > >>> > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-June/721613.html should > >>> solve this. > >>> > >>> Are you able to check that, or should I push it to the forge and ask > >>> the linaro ci-bot to check it? > >> > >> I can give it a try. Will let you know about the outcome tomorrow. > > > > Great, thanks. I'll be revising the patch slightly, but it would still > > be good to know if the general approach solves the problem. > > > > I can confirm that your patch resolves the failures on arm-none-eabi that I > targeted with my original patch. > I can also confirm that your patch does not cause any regressions for any of > the arm-none-eabi permutations that I test.
Great, thanks for confirming it. > Thank you for fixing this a better way than mine! This way the functionality actually works on Cortex-M0 (and similar targets without full atomics).
