Le 14/08/2026 à 18:23, Jerry D a écrit :
On 8/13/26 7:05 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 13/08/2026 à 00:27, Jerry DeLisle a écrit :
See below, I added a version number on the patch file name, re-attached.
Err, I double checked again, still the same patch.
The second version patch was in [1], and as followup to my answer,
your next message with a patch [2] and the latest [3] contain the same
patch as [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064457.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064463.html
[3] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064469.html
On 8/10/26 8:20 AM, Jerry D wrote:
What did go away is the particular part. There is now one check,
gfc_is_span_addressed_dummy (gfc_symbol *)
used by gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, gfc_get_symbol_decl,
This function `gfc_is_span_addressed_dummy' is nowhere in the patch.
So the message must have the wrong patch attached to it?
I made it home late yesterday. Please accept my apologies.
No problem. Everybody makes mistakes.
The attached is the correct patch file.
OK for mainline?
Yes, OK. Your explanations in the other message were convincing.
Sorry for the time it has taken.
