On 8/17/26 12:52 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 14/08/2026 à 18:23, Jerry D a écrit :
On 8/13/26 7:05 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 13/08/2026 à 00:27, Jerry DeLisle a écrit :
See below, I added a version number on the patch file name, re-attached.
Err, I double checked again, still the same patch.
The second version patch was in [1], and as followup to my answer, your next
message with a patch [2] and the latest [3] contain the same patch as [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064457.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064463.html
[3] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-August/064469.html
On 8/10/26 8:20 AM, Jerry D wrote:
What did go away is the particular part. There is now one check,
gfc_is_span_addressed_dummy (gfc_symbol *)
used by gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, gfc_get_symbol_decl,
This function `gfc_is_span_addressed_dummy' is nowhere in the patch. So the
message must have the wrong patch attached to it?
I made it home late yesterday. Please accept my apologies.
No problem. Everybody makes mistakes.
The attached is the correct patch file.
OK for mainline?
Yes, OK. Your explanations in the other message were convincing.
Sorry for the time it has taken.
Sorry for my blunders. Thanks for the review and patients.
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3943597388db4846386b6d5a18d33ebf80ea96c
commit r17-3342-gf3943597388db4846386b6d5a18d33ebf80ea96c
