On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote: > +<p>GCC now uses more a aggressive analysis to derive an upper bound for
I think "a " should be omitted here. > +the number of iterations of loops using constraints imposed by language > +standards. This may cause non-conforming programs to no longer work as > +expected, such as SPEC CPU 2006 464.h264ref and 416.gamess. A new > +option, <code>-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations</code>, was added > +to disable this aggressive analysis.</p> Personally I would reduce aggressiveness and omit "aggressive" in the last line above. :-) Gerald
