On 19 April 2013 16:19, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> Good point, thanks!
> Revised patch attached.
I've committed that version, thanks very much.
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 19 April 2013 15:42, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> according to n3242 8.5.6,
>>>
>>> If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of a
>>> const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided
>>> default constructor.
>>>
>>> This patches fixes 3 places in libstdc++ code where this requirement
>>> is violated.
>>
>> The violation is how the objects are initialized, not how the class is
>> defined.
>>
>> I would prefer to just add {} to the initializers not add the constructors.
