Thanks a lot.
Forgot to mention it earlier, can this be backported in the 4_8 branch as well?

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 16:19, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Good point, thanks!
>> Revised patch attached.
>
> I've committed that version, thanks very much.
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2013 15:42, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> according to n3242 8.5.6,
>>>>
>>>> If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of a
>>>> const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided
>>>> default constructor.
>>>>
>>>> This patches fixes 3 places in libstdc++ code where this requirement
>>>> is violated.
>>>
>>> The violation is how the objects are initialized, not how the class is 
>>> defined.
>>>
>>> I would prefer to just add {} to the initializers not add the constructors.

Reply via email to