On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:35 PM, H.J. Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Iyer, Balaji V <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:gcc-patches-
>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:52 PM
>>> To: Iyer, Balaji V
>>> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Aldy Hernandez; Jeff Law; 'Joseph S. Myers';
>>> 'gcc-patches'
>>> Subject: Re: [PING]RE: [patch] cilkplus: Array notation for C patch
>>>
>>> On 05/28/2013 11:44 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>>> > i Richard, Jakub et al..
>>> > I think I have fixed everything requested by RTH
>>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01400.html). I think I have
>>> also moved the tests in the correct place Jakub requested. It is passing
>>> all the
>>> correct regression tests and not affecting others.
>>> >
>>> > Is this patch OK for trunk?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's ok.
>>
>> This patch is committed to trunk at revision 199389.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> On Linux/x32, I got
>
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -O0 -fcilkplus execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -O0 -std=c99
> execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -g -O0 -std=c99
> execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -g -std=c99 execution
> test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus -std=c99 execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -fcilkplus execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -g -O0 -fcilkplus execution test
> FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c -g -fcilkplus execution test
>
>
> [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/xgcc
> -B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c
> -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fcilkplus -g
> -O0 -std=c99 -fcilkplus -lm -m32 -o ./if_test.exe
> [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/xgcc
> -B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c
> -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -fcilkplus -g
> -O0 -std=c99 -fcilkplus -lm -mx32 -o ./if_test.exe
> [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ ./if_test.exe
> [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ echo $?
> 5
> [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$
>
> (gdb) r
> Starting program:
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/bld/gcc/testsuite/gcc/if_test.exe
>
> Breakpoint 1, main2 (argc=3, argv=0xffffd240)
> at
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-x32/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c:131
> 131 return 5;
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.16-30.1.fc18.x32
> (gdb) p ii
> $1 = 0
> (gdb) p array2_check
> $2 = {5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5}
> (gdb) p array2
> $3 = {10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10}
> (gdb)
>
> Does cilkplus assume ptr_mode == word_mode? On x32, ptr_mode == SImode
> and word_mode == DImode.
>
> --
> H.J.
Comment out
/* atoi(argv[1]) == 10, so it will convert all 10's to 5's */
if (FourDArray[0:10:1][0:5:2][9:10:-1][x:y:z] +
FourDArray[0:10:1][0:5:2][9:-10:1][x:y:z] != 20)
array2[:] = 10;
else
array2[:] = 5;
makes the problem to disappear.
--
H.J.
