On 06/06/14 15:40, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 6 June 2014 01:32, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
Have these been tested for both big and little endian (especially for
tests where memory layout matters - load / store / lane number tests -
remembering that GNU C vector initializers always use array ordering,
which is not the same as the architecture-defined lane numbering for big
endian)?
I did run the tests on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf (with qemu), and in
addition to the FAILs I already mentionned I can see errors in the
vzip and vuzp tests.
At this stage I don't know if it's a bug in my tests or a compiler bug.
Didn't Alan recently fix a bug for big-endian in vzip / vuzp ?
PR target/61062
Ramana
However my tests initialize vectors using vld1, not vector
initializers so I think there shouldn't be this problem.
Christophe.
