On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, David Wohlferd wrote: > I don't have permissions to commit this patch, but I do have a release on file > with the FSF. > > Problem description: > The text for using Explicit Register Variables is confusing, redundant, and > fails to make certain essential information clear.
[...] Bah, Jeff already made all the good comments... :] Happy to see this area improved though! > - Unambiguous statements such as "The following uses are explicitly /not/ > supported" when describing things such as calling Basic asm discourage people > from attempting to misuse the feature. I'm somewhat wary that having an explicitly-not-supported list, would imply that some (or every) other crazy user invention is supported. > +Other implementation details: Not really _implementation_ details though, at least not all of them. Maybe "Notable details" or something. Thanks! brgds, H-P
