On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Marek Polacek wrote: > PR62294 reports that 4.9 does not emit an "incompatible pointer type" > warning in certain scenario. I unknowingly broke this in r207335, and > then fixed it in r210980, which is a follow-up to the former. But 4.9 > doesn't have the latter. This patch is basically a backport of r210980, > only without the traditional conversion stuff. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for 4.9?
OK with a testcase specifically for the regression case added on trunk and 4.9 if there isn't one already. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com