On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote: > Why removing the tree_code check?
The actual problem happens because STRING_CSTs (end up in .lrodata) are not set a far address as they dont match the VAR_DECL check here. Futher, "ix86_in_large_data_p" call has the TREE_CODE check to do the right thing so this seems unnecessary & buggy here. Thanks Sri > > David > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch is under review for trunk GCC : >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01638.html. >> >> In the mean time, is this ok for google/gcc-4_9 branch? Without >> this, -mcmodel=medium is unusable if .lrodata goes beyond the 2G >> boundary. >> >> Thanks >> Sri
