gcc  

Messages by Date

• 2025/03/08 Re: make error when builing gcc Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 Re: make error when builing gcc LIU Hao via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 make error when builing gcc Gwen Fu via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 Re: What branch to use for the Algol 68 front-end Mark Wielaard
• 2025/03/07 gcc-13-20250307 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 Re: What branch to use for the Algol 68 front-end Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 What branch to use for the Algol 68 front-end Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
• 2025/03/07 Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
• 2025/03/06 Re: Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/03/06 gcc-12-20250306 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/03/06 Re: some Small questions of a new hand Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/03/06 Re: Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option Gabriel Ravier via Gcc
• 2025/03/06 some Small questions of a new hand Gwen Fu via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: gcc-git-customization.sh error Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: gcc-git-customization.sh error Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: gcc-git-customization.sh error Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: gcc-git-customization.sh error Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 gcc-git-customization.sh error Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
• 2025/03/05 web page c++-status proposal revision updates Heiko Eißfeldt
• 2025/03/04 Re: GCC GSoC 2025: Call for project ideas and mentors Martin Jambor
• 2025/03/04 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output NightStrike via Gcc
• 2025/03/04 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/04 Re: gcc 3.2.3 i370 with z/PDOS-generic and mfemul Paul Edwards via Gcc
• 2025/03/04 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/03/03 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/03 [GSoC] Proposal Discussion:Fortran – run-time argument checking Gwen Fu via Gcc
• 2025/03/03 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/03/02 Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
• 2025/03/02 gcc-15-20250302 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 gcc 3.2.3 i370 with z/PDOS-generic and mfemul Paul Edwards via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 gcc-14-20250301 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Alexander Monakov
• 2025/03/01 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Alexander Monakov
• 2025/03/01 gcc-13-20250301 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/03/01 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 [GSoC][Rewrite Rust lints]: Suggestions to get started 岡田隆太郎 via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Paul Smith via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Alexander Monakov
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: [GSoC][Rewrite Rust lints]: Suggestions to get started Martin Jambor
• 2025/02/28 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Paul Smith via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output Paul Smith via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Martin Jambor
• 2025/02/28 Re: RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output NightStrike via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Re: Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/02/28 Re: Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/02/28 Re: Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/02/28 Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/02/28 Re: [PATCH v18 0/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Re: memory model, READ_ONCE Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 memory model, READ_ONCE Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 RFC: A redesign of `-Mmodules` output vspefs via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 gcc-12-20250227 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Introduction & Interest in GCC Rust Frontend GSoC Project Bright Andoh via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Re: aarch64 built-in SIMD types Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Re: [PATCH v18 0/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Re: [PATCH v18 0/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Joseph Myers via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 Re: [PATCH v18 0/2] c: Add __countof__ operator Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2025/02/27 GCC 15.0.1 Status Report (2025-02-27), Stage 4 still in effect Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/25 Grow Your Shopify Store..! Samir Aalam via Gcc
• 2025/02/25 Re: aarch64 built-in SIMD types Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
• 2025/02/25 Re: aarch64 built-in SIMD types Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Re: Change between g++-9.4.0 and g++-14.2.0 Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Change between g++-9.4.0 and g++-14.2.0 Sidney Marshall
• 2025/02/24 Gcc - MIPIM 2025 Samantha Dickerson
• 2025/02/24 Re: Backend for a stack-oriented architecture Florian Weimer
• 2025/02/24 Re: Backend for a stack-oriented architecture Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 aarch64 built-in SIMD types Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Mark Rutland via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Re: Backend for a stack-oriented architecture Michael Matz via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Attila Szegedi via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Florian Weimer
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Attila Szegedi via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 Backend for a stack-oriented architecture Florian Weimer
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Florian Weimer
• 2025/02/24 Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• 2025/02/24 GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64 Attila Szegedi via Gcc
• 2025/02/23 gcc-15-20250223 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/23 Re: How to test Arm cross compiler? Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/02/23 How to test Arm cross compiler? Jan Dubiec via Gcc
• 2025/02/23 missing features related to static chain Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2025/02/22 gcc-14-20250222 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/22 [no subject] Pp Pj via Gcc
• 2025/02/21 gcc-13-20250221 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/21 Issues with -Wno-format-truncation Aaron Gray via Gcc
• 2025/02/21 ด้วยอัตราดอกเบี้ยที่แตกต่าง เพื่อให้เข้าถึงแหล่งเงินทุน TPL Group via Gcc
• 2025/02/20 gcc-12-20250220 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/19 Re: GCC for C6x DSPs Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2025/02/18 Re: GCC for C6x DSPs Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2025/02/18 Re: GCC for C6x DSPs Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/17 GCC for C6x DSPs Dan via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Commits not appearing in bugzilla Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 gcc-15-20250216 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Modules deprecation rumors Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Commits not appearing in bugzilla Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Re: Commits not appearing in bugzilla Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/16 Re: Commits not appearing in bugzilla Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2025/02/16 Commits not appearing in bugzilla Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/15 gcc-14-20250215 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/14 gcc-13-20250214 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/14 Re: To access gcc.gnu.org received Forbiden Thomacelli via Gcc
• 2025/02/14 Re: To access gcc.gnu.org received Forbiden Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/14 To access gcc.gnu.org received Forbiden Thomacelli via Gcc
• 2025/02/14 Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
• 2025/02/14 Re: git gcc-verify question Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 Re: Current trunk fails to build gmp Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 Current trunk fails to build gmp Rainer Emrich
• 2025/02/13 git gcc-verify question Jerry D via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 gcc-12-20250213 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
• 2025/02/13 Sourceware Open Valentine Office Friday, Feb 14, 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/12 Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 Classes Implicitly Declared Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 Re: Tobias Hunger via Gcc
• 2025/02/12 [no subject] Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
• 2025/02/11 Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Toon Moene
• 2025/02/11 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/11 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Sam James via Gcc
• 2025/02/10 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/02/10 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/02/10 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/10 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/10 Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Palmer Dabbelt
• 2025/02/10 Inbound Caller left (3) VM MSG 00:0430 DURATION-0da4d5e134752a5ecc311012c1cfef2e Call_Service-PlayBack_transit.securedata.com.securecloud.packetflow.net*ju757849*2526a5lki887?*9936928987656789876567898764f4-mail.protect.outlook.commx.box615bfe9fc949fcccc54392c416c2fe0a-a8d90738fc1ae1d2fe925d1623e943a0mx.01-
• 2025/02/10 Re: How "()" works and why Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/10 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 gcc-15-20250209 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 Re: How "()" works and why Nicholas Vinson via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Jerry D via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 How "()" works and why саша савельев
• 2025/02/09 Re: Classes Implicitly Declared Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 Re: On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
• 2025/02/09 RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/08 Classes Implicitly Declared Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
• 2025/02/08 gcc-14-20250208 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/08 , Welcome to the formation of the IWACCE 2025 session! IWACCE 2025 via Gcc
• 2025/02/08 [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1 Nelson Chu
• 2025/02/07 gcc-13-20250207 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/07 Re: [wwwdocs] cannot access from brazil Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/07 [wwwdocs] cannot access from brazil Paulo Almeida via Gcc
• 2025/02/07 On master, with checking=all, I get dozens of fails for g++, already for months on end. Toon Moene
• 2025/02/06 gcc-12-20250206 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2025/02/06 US mirror sites missing newer versions Michael Leuchtenburg via Gcc
• 2025/02/05 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/02/05 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Gerald Pfeifer
• 2025/02/05 GCC Steering Committee attention, Re: [WIP 0/8] Algol 68 GCC Front-End Thomas Schwinge
• 2025/02/04 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/04 Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/04 RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Basile Starynkevitch
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Mark Wielaard
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Andreas Schwab via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Interest in Contributing Diagnostic System to GCC JohnyTheCarrot via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2025/02/03 Re: Patch held up in gcc-patches due to size Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 Re: GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 GCC Fails to Compile When Command Line Argument Size Exceeds 128KB Geeta Dora via Gcc
• 2025/02/02 gcc-15-20250202 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages