>> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
Is there any chance ... (sorry for typo)
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 2:41 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly <gmt3...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system is old and a
> full GCC build takes about 30 hours. I learnt that the maximum build time
> spent is in LTO. I wrote a simple shell script to check LTO progress:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> AWKP='
> BEGIN { RS=" " ; w = COLS - 19 }
> END { progressbar(current, total) }
>
> /ltrans.o/ { current++ }
> /ltrans[0-9]+.o/ { total++ }
>
> function progressbar(current, total) {
> if (total == 0) {
> printf(" %s Waiting!\r", substr("|/-\\", 1 + systime() % 4, 1))
> return
> }
> progress = current / total
> prefix = sprintf(" %d/%d [", current, total)
> suffix = sprintf("] %.1f%%", 100 * progress)
> width = COLS - length(prefix) - length(suffix)
> bar = ""
> for (col = 0; col < width; col++)
> bar = bar (col / width < progress ? "=" : " ")
> printf("%s%s%s\r", prefix, bar, suffix)
> }'
>
> while [ 1 ] ; do
> echo $(ls /tmp/*ltrans* 2> /dev/null) | gawk -v COLS=`tput cols`
> "$AWKP"
> sleep 1
> done
>
> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
> upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
>
> I need LTO. Is there a way to have LTO in GCC, without LTOing the GCC
> itself? This way my builds will be many times faster.
>
> Regards and thanks to your awesome compilers
>
> --
> *Ghorban M. Tavakoly*
> Phone number: +98 (902) (2²⁰+2¹⁹+2¹⁸+…+2²+2¹+2⁰)
>
>
