Hi Heiko, Thanks for doing this...
> On 30 Apr 2025, at 18:53, Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: > > On 30/04/2025 17:23, Heiko Eißfeldt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here is a patch for some mostly minor typos in >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/changes.html. >> My fixes might be wrong of course, so they are just suggestions. >> >> Also, the linked page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/porting_to.html contains >> the now outdated >> "Note: GCC 15 has not been released yet, so this document is a >> work-in-progress." >> which is luckily not true anymore. >> >> Greetings and thanks, Heiko >> > > - The diagnostics code has seen a major refactor, it now supports the sarif > + The diagnostics code has seen a major refactoring, it now supports the > sarif > > I think 'has seen major refactoring' would be better. > > -<code>DerefMut</code>. This makes <code>gccrs</code> more correct and allow > to handle > +<code>DerefMut</code>. This makes <code>gccrs</code> more correct and allows > to handle > complicated cases where the type-checker would previously fail. > > allows handling > > - <li>Although most variadic functions work, the implementation > - of them is not yet complete. > + <li>Although most variadic functions work, the implementations > + of them are not yet complete. > > Drop 'of them', then stick with the singular - 'the implementation is not yet > complete' > > - <li>FEAT_LRCPC2 (<code>+rcpc2</code>), enabled by default for > + <li>FEAT_RCPC2 (<code>+rcpc2</code>), enabled by default for > > and > > - FEAT_LRCPC3 instructions, when support for the instructions is > + FEAT_RCPC3 instructions, when support for the instructions is > > These are incorrect. The features really are FEAT_LRCPC2/3. > > Otherwise, I think these look generally like improvements. > … If you’re fixing typos in this area there’s another one in the AArch64 section: The following architecture level is now supported by -march and related source-level constructs (GCC identifiers in parentheses): • Armv9.5-A (arm9.5-a) The identifier should be “armv9.5-a” Thanks, Kyrill > R. > >
