> On 12/08/2025 4:41 AM PST Александр Поваляев <[email protected]> wrote: > This is how explicit conversion looks like - "subfunc((struct zzz const * > const * const)arr_of_ptr);". > Per me, it is awful and makes the code less readable.
That's partially your fault, since you keep adding that redundant and nonsensical `const` at the end. Let me fix that for you: subfunc((struct zzz const * const *) arr_of_ptr); See? A lot more readable! Of course, typedef-ing your struct would've made the code even shorter. -- Best regards, Andrey
