On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:24 PM Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 02:10:31PM +0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 6:10 AM Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 07:27:15PM +0000, Sam James via Overseers
> wrote:
> > > > Can we please require that a Bugzilla account is created during the
> > > > process for commit access approval by overseers (BZ lets admins
> create
> > > > accounts, this should be easy)
> > >
> > > Yes, we could do that. Either automated, by hand or by sending email
> > > on account creation to gcc-bugzilla-account-request.
> > >
> > > > or we add it as a manual step like updating MAINTAINERS?
> > >
> > > There will always be a manual step like that because the bugzilla
> > > account needs to be activated by resetting the password.
> > >
> > > Question is if we should also do this for all existing accounts that
> > > don't have a corresponding bugzilla account. Some people just use the
> > > email address in the MAINTAINERS file.
> >
> > I'd expect that all email addresses in MAINTAINERS should have a bugzilla
> > account.  And all @gcc.gnu.org accounts as well.
>
> Do you really mean both a personal and a gcc.gnu.org account?  I
> suspect (but haven't checked yet) that most people use either one or
> the other.
>

Hmm, personally I only actually use my @gcc.gnu.org account but also have
a @redhat.com account and people can CC either one.  Perhaps if I only had
the @gcc.gnu.org account it would cut down on the frequency of getting
email to both addresses for the same bug.  But might be confusing to people
trying to CC the address I use in commits.

> Incidentally, I seem to have an unneeded account for
> > [email protected], can we remove that?
>
> Merged into [email protected] (it only had two bugs associated with it).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>

Reply via email to