Simon Sobisch <[email protected]> writes: > Bad side (the understandable reason Jim dislikes that): a user may code > something that doesn't work - not sure if there are any GCC / glibc parts > which > behave similar.
It's certainly possible to create builds of GCC with some features missing (IIRC it's possible that libstdc++ may not be able to do some things in absence of iconv, for instance, but don't quote me on that). It's a fairly reasonable and frequent compromise to leave some features as non-operational without extra libs present. -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
