> Am 20.05.2026 um 23:11 schrieb Martin Uecker via Gcc <[email protected]>: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 20.05.2026 um 19:50 +0200 schrieb Eric Botcazou: >>> I'd tend to prefer moving to -Wextra. Though I suspect they'll bitrot >>> over time in there :( I've seen them find real issues, but I think it's >>> reasonably clear that they're causing more pain than they're solving. >> >> FWIW that's also my experience. > > I sometimes find them useful (in C, C++ might be affected differently). > > I also observe that people invent entirely new languages which are much > stricter and which fail hard for things which would be considered > false positives, so keeping them at least in -Wextra would seem > appropriate to me. It seems to be a reasonable, if intermediate step. Richard > > Martin
- Re: Is it time to take ... Matthias Kretz via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Martin Uecker via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Matthias Kretz via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-en... Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-end stringop/ar... Andrew Pinski via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-end string... Jeffrey Law via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-end st... Eric Botcazou
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-en... Martin Uecker via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middl... Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the ... Martin Uecker via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-end string... Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-end st... Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middle-en... Jason Merrill via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the middl... Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Is it time to take the ... Andrew Pinski via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take the ... Andrew MacLeod via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Jeffrey Law via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Martin Uecker via Gcc
- Re: Is it time to take ... Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
