On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 12:14 PM DJ Delorie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 3:03 PM Andrea Pinski via Binutils > <[email protected]> wrote: > > So there was no consensus on the community members except for the ones > > who were at the meeting? > > You would prefer "so there was no consensus except for the ones who > were on the mailing list" ? > > Carlos and Mark have both been diligent in announcing these meetings > and posting minutes. If you choose to ignore them, that's on you.
Hmm, no carlos has been diligent in announcing the meetings. Also it conflicts with many other meetings I have. And it is NOT a time that is viable for me. So I have not chosen to ignore them. And now you are dictating how this consensus should be brought together in the same way you mention Zack is doing. > > > Ok. I think that it is wrong to have separate domains. > > I think it's inevitable. > > > Also why NOT just one email list? Why 6 mailing lists? > > Why not 47? Why not zero? If you have a specific request, please > make it and justify it. We have an *opportunity* to reorganize > mailing lists if/when we move the mail servers, but we *can* > reorganize the lists any time we want, too. Right and that is my point this should be a separate unrelated discussion rather there are many different discussions going on and things are being tied to the move for no reason. > > > What is the need for glibc-stable? > > Downstream maintainers who need to watch for bugfixes. I would hope > by now everyone would know this. Why not just use -announcement for that? >
