Since I don't understand really if what I'm saying makes sense, I think
the best solution is to revert because it is also affecting people that
use --disable-bootstrap (whom I cannot blame at all).
That would certainly be better than the current situation, although if
you look at Makefile.tpl and EXTRA_GCC_FLAGS, you'll see that we already
apply this treatment to BOOT_ADAFLAGS and this worked as expected,
so why treating ADAFLAGS (using e.g. for cross compilers) differently ?
I'm not saying I don't like the idea, but I'm not prepared to do it and
I surely don't want to "slip it under the door" as obvious.
Paolo
