On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:19 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > > gs_assign_unary_rhs (gs) <- Access the only operand on RHS > gs_assign_binary_rhs1 (gs) <- Access the 1st RHS operand > gs_assign_binary_rhs2 (gs) <- Access the 2nd RHS operand > > And the corresponding _set functions. > > I then managed to half convince myself that it'd be better to have a > single gs_assign_rhs() accessor with a 'which' parameter. After > implementing that, I think I hate it. Particularly since this 'which' > parameter is just a number (0 or 1). It could be a mnemonic, but it > would still be annoying. > > So, I'm thinking of going back to the way it was before, but it is not > optimal. Do people feel strongly over one or the other?
I prefer something like the original mechanism, no flags or parameters. I find that more natural in an interface. flags and parameters are old school :-) Andrew
