On 6/20/07 7:13 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > I may be missing something, but surely having the accessors uniform > would be better? So that I can write things like > > /* Process all operands. */ > for (i = 0; i < n_operands (gs); i++) > process (gs_assign_rhs (gs, i));
Yeah, we already have that. It's just that 'i' is never > 3. operand 0 is the LHS, operand 1 and operand 2 are the RHS. My issue was with the functions that are more commonly invoked to deal with each RHS operand.
