David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So far all I read is complaints from you and Richard, but no > offers to implement your more extensive proposal in the next few weeks. > You simply are making demands that volunteers implement more extensive > transformation. This is a giant Bike Shed preventing incremental > improvement in GCC.
I don't understand what you mean here. I'm asking for the target uses of no_new_pseudos to be kept the same -- with no_new_pseudos defined as a macro, if necessary -- whereas Kenny is trying to get rid of them. Surely getting rid of something is a more extensive change than keeping it? Especially since Kenny often says that changing the backend is not something he's particularly comfortable doing. What Alex and I are suggesting seems to require fewer backend changes. Richard
