-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Guenther wrote:
>> | It has also not yet been decided whether backports of bug-fixes from >> | GPLv3 versions of GCC to older GPLv2 versions of GCC (e.g., GCC 4.1) >> >> We can make a final release from GCC-4.1.x and close it definitely. >> We should strive for some kind of mononiticy in terms of release >> series and licensing. > > We can just close the branch. Though I expect vendors to continue to need > to maintain it for another 5+ years. Maybe we can get mutual agreement > from contributors to re-license their contributions to currently active > branches > under GPL v2 as well and this way side-stepping the FSF on this matter. This sounds ideal, but I'm concerned a little bit about how this interacts with the copyright assignment to FSF. When a contributor assigns copyright to FSF, do they still have the right to license their changes separately? - --BDS - -- Benjamin Smedberg Platform Guru Mozilla Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGlkulSSwGp5sTYNkRAhkvAJ41Ki5bNRPYYg6ruN9osh1ebXq2wQCfSjTy 9iM05WCf/CPmr4C8Qny4+GQ= =r9D3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
