On 12 July 2007 18:42, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:58 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> If you want to release gcc 4.2.2, and then release gcc 4.3.0 from the
>> gcc 4.2 branch, and make mainline gcc the eventual gcc 4.4.0, I'm on
>> board with that. That is easy enough to understand and not too
>> difficult to implement. What I'm disagreeing with is moving from gcc
>> 4.2.2 to gcc 4.3.3.
>
> This would be similar to going from GCC 3.1.1 to GCC 3.2 when there
> was a break in binary compatibility.
Well, it would be more similar to going from 3.1.1 to 3.2.2 and never having
had a 3.2.0 or a 3.2.1 .....
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
