On 7/27/07 9:58 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> I liked the idea of 'Reviewers' more than any of the other options.
>> I would like to go with this patch, unless we find a much better
>> option?
>
> to cancel this category of maintainers completely?
An interesting idea, but let's discuss that issue separately. In this
thread I'm only interested in changing the name of this category. Not
discuss whether the category should exist at all.
Since I have not heard any strong opposition to changing the category
name to 'Reviewers', I will go ahead with this patch later this week.
Index: MAINTAINERS
===================================================================
--- MAINTAINERS (revision 126951)
+++ MAINTAINERS (working copy)
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
maintainers need approval to check in algorithmic changes or changes
outside of the parts of the compiler they maintain.
- Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers
+ Reviewers
dataflow Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dataflow Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@@ -251,10 +251,9 @@
Fortran Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Note that individuals who maintain parts of the compiler as
-non-autopoiesis maintainers need approval changes outside of the parts
-of the compiler they maintain and also need approval for their own
-patches.
+Note that individuals who maintain parts of the compiler as reviewers
+need approval for changes outside of the parts of the compiler they
+maintain and also need approval for their own patches.
Write After Approval (last name alphabetical
order)
