Martin Jambor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| The reason why I believe the patch is safe not only in practice but | also in principle However, I do not believe it is sufficient. The reason being that if the user does not include a header that pulls in that declaration, then that 'malloc' attribute will be in effect. The abstract semantics is that replaceable `operator new' functions are implicitly declared in *every* translation unit -- and that is what GCC does --, and you should have those implicit declarations carry the attributes, not just the one defined in libstdc++. -- Gaby
