Tomas Svensson wrote:
It seems that gcc has emitted rtl describing a memory reference (mem (plus (mem (plus (reg ..) (const_int ..))) (const_int ..))), which should not have been permitted by GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS since it only allows (mem (plus (reg ..) (const ..))), and forbids a second level of memory reference.
This is probably a REG_OK_STRICT bug. During reload, an unallocated pseudo-reg is actually a memory reference in disguise, so you must check for and reject pseudo-regs during reload. This is handled by the REG_OK_STRICT macro. Just look at any port to see how to handle this correctly.
Jim
