On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > Hyphenated. It's not a line option of a command, it's an option of a > command-line.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > As an adjective I think it should be "command-line"; I'm sure Sandra will > correct me if I'm wrong here. On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > As an adjective immediately preceding the noun it modifies, yes, it should be > hyphenated: "command-line option". But if you use "command line" as a noun, > use the unhyphenated form; e.g., "use the -foo option on the command line". Thanks to the three of you for your guidance on this, Dave, Joseph, and Sandra! I am committing the patch below to our coding conventions and will fix up the existing web pages accordingly. Gerald Index: codingconventions.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/codingconventions.html,v retrieving revision 1.52 diff -u -3 -p -r1.52 codingconventions.html --- codingconventions.html 10 Sep 2007 18:45:48 -0000 1.52 +++ codingconventions.html 19 Sep 2007 22:29:05 -0000 @@ -270,6 +270,11 @@ and code. The following table lists som <td></td> </tr> <tr> + <td>"command-line option"</td> + <td>"command line option"</td> + <td></td> + </tr> + <tr> <td>"dependent" (adjective), "dependence", "dependency"</td> <td>"dependant", "dependance", "dependancy"</td> <td></td>