Steve Kenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it ever possible to build libmudflap, libssp, or libgomp when > inhibit_libc is set?
It seems unlikely. > If not, is is reasonable to add a check to the top level configure to detect > situations that will cause gcc configure to set inhibit_libc and add those > libraries to either skipdirs or noconfigdirs. (Which would be preferred?) > It looks like just a couple of lines in configure to exclude them > automatically > if they can never build under that condition on any target. That seems reasonable in principle. They should be added to skipdirs. Ideally the condition expressing when inhibit_libc should be set should be done in a single place, and then somehow communicated to other places. In the current inhibit_libc condition I don't understand the interaction between --with-newlib and --with-headers. If newlib is available, inhibit_libc normally should not be defined. Ian
